> that she often got caught up in trends.
Serious relationship crusher: one person sitting on tiktok/reels all day and setting expectations for their own relationship based on that (often staged) content. Really not healthy to constantly have that level of pressure on your head.
> According to reports, the woman asked ChatGPT to interpret the coffee grounds left in her cup — in a lighthearted attempt to mimic traditional fortune-telling. The AI responded, supposedly describing a young woman with the initial “E,” claiming the husband had strong feelings for her and that the relationship would soon become a reality.
ChatGPT is not to blame, they could have gone to a coffee-grounds (human) reader and done the same. If someone can show that human coffee-grounds readers are better than ChatGPT, then there might be a case.
Not sure if this is a controversial opinion but if the wife decides to divorce the husband based on what ChatGPT says, perhaps the husband is better off.
There was actually a similar thing on this website where someone here claimed in an article comment section that if you feed your wife's emails into ChatGPT it can simulate her well enough to tell you whether she is cheating.
The weird thing is I looked at the posting history of that commenter and it was bland tech comments with no obvious signs of mental health issues.
Reading from the comments here I was expecting at lot more meat about the case, but it's just a report on anonymous reports and what the husband allegedly told to the press ?
Otherwise, does a divorce really need anything more than one party willing to get out of the relationship ?
Even assuming anyone is calling it quits on frivolous grounds, it also means that's how much emotional investment there was left in the first place and they were due for a break any day really.
That's the real risk of AI.
People blindly belueving a machine
Is this materially different from all the wives divorcing their husbands because their friends predict he will cheat on her?
There were societally beneficial reasons that divorce used to be hard to achieve, and the fickleness of the inconstant moon was one of them, to reference Juliet.
I mean this is a good thing right? If the person you are with would leave you due to what they read online, then that's a massive red flag and you should probably break it off with them anyways. Why would you even want to stay with someone like that?
I wonder at what point people decide marriage isn't worth it and the increase in risk (because of no fault and annoying cultural climate) is priced in
I'm already there personally, it just looks like a rip off
Good for him ? First, I thought the AI was materializing her projections - but actually, she chose to relate with ChatGPT (!) in conspiring against him - which obviously must have to take advantage of that opportunity and some leaves chains in a cup happen to be aligned or weighted so, so well. For them, fallen under control of such factors.. - can they escape from it after all somehow, if they want ? - or, better maybe.. shall they be happy for the wish they/she granted, deserving it, granted by ?? ;)
So now, "" it's some of third Popper world frozen unequivalently at a past time.. [slope shaped..] - since then, * IT * self-repeat and decide usurping about us already in such a way.. .
btw elsewhere now it happen [flagged, overtake]. The next ? (.) (modus operandi?) .?
[flagged]