To be fair, way too often I noticed it's better to make a bad decision than not making one. Not making one is still a decision (don't act), which carry plenty of problems
i think, if i could only have one, id have accuracy, but because sometimes you can have both, and its hard to tell when, most businesses go on the assumption of having their cake and eating it too, and then being shocked when their presumption is incorrect, instead of realizing its inevitably going to happen sometimes that speed burns you. and other situations, i have to accept the fact that accuracy is not always paramount
As I've said before, if there are two sides to an argument, I see all three of them.
But all seriousness aside, I do have trouble making my mind up about some things--I think. I'm still trying to decide whether that's true...
Obviously haven't met me when I'm ADHD'd decision fatigued out.
There is no indecision. There is only deciding not to act.
Also it relate to executives who make quick decisions as being the ones who make their way up the ladder faster as it is deemed to be better to make quick decisions (as long as it doesn't completely blow up or you have someone else you can pin it on).
Makes sense that fast decisions align with what your priors are. Those who take their time balance more possibilities.