Comparing AWS's RDS and PlanetScale

by gagejustinson 10/5/21, 3:17 PMwith 14 comments
by vmaenon 10/5/21, 4:02 PM

Great comparison, but i feel like it would be fair to mention support for foreign key constraints in the overview table (which planetscale doesn‘t have, afaik)

by wcdolphinon 10/5/21, 4:08 PM

The “Trusted by” page has some pretty impressive flagship companies (GitHub, Slack, Square, AirBnb). Is anyone familiar with the role in which Planetscale is used at those companies? (Unless that is advertising users of vitess vs the hosted offering).

by pid-1on 10/5/21, 3:40 PM

If one only needs a database, it's probably not worth to go to AWS due the unnecessary complexity.

Now if you're using other services, be aware of egress costs, which are not mentioned in the article.

by mabboon 10/5/21, 4:06 PM

Does anyone have a good reference to a comparison of the two products that isn't written by someone with a strong financial incentive for you to pick one over the other?

by pachicoon 10/6/21, 11:59 AM

The main issue that doesn't seem to be reflected here is that it's really hard to have a database and your application in different locations. Latency and security are big components in the general equation and both might be affected by this.

(This is the same reason why, although there are excellent Redis-as-a-service products, it's hard to justify to use them at all.)

by autotuneon 10/6/21, 12:04 AM

This is how you beat Amazon/AWS, you go for the 40 percent where they fall behind in their products and make it better. They have a broad set of tooling not a particularly deep set of tooling.

by wizwit999on 10/7/21, 3:07 AM

Isn't Aurora a better apple to apple comparisonm