So he's giving an unspecified part of his disposable income, but not selling any of his very valuable saleable assets, and that makes him a hypocrite.
What does that make of ordinary homeowners? People who could borrow another $100k on their home, or sell it, but don't?
So he's giving an unspecified part of his disposable income, but not selling any of his very valuable saleable assets, and that makes him a hypocrite.
What does that make of ordinary homeowners? People who could borrow another $100k on their home, or sell it, but don't?